Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ryan Nijboer vs Shintaro Mochizuki Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nijboer vs Mochizuki analysis and find out who is favored!
Ryan Nijboer vs Shintaro Mochizuki Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nijboer 1 - 0 Mochizuki
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nijboer has won 49.07% of points on their second serve, while Mochizuki has won 45.58%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nijboer, in recent form, has won 53.55% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mochizuki has won 50.66%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.94% and 35.27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nijboer has saved 51.46% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mochizuki has saved 52.8% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nijboer has won 62.22% of matches played (W/L 56/ 34), with Mochizuki winning 48.15% (W/L 26/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13). Mochizuki has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 59/ 39), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 13/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.35% of matches (W/L 43/ 19), where as Mochizuki has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 9/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nijboer winning 1 times and Mochizuki being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nijboer winning 2 and Mochizuki winning 0. The last match between Nijboer and Mochizuki was at the Francavilla Challenger, 07-05-2024, First, Clay with Ryan Nijboer getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:1.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nijboer and Mochizuki have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nijboer winning 0 times and Mochizuki 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nijboer winning 0, and Mochizuki 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nijboer has played against opponents with an average rank of 189.27 while Mochizuki has played against players with an average rank of 256.87.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nijboer has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mochizuki has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nijboer has converted 45.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mochizuki has converted 45.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
433
Rank
428
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
162
Rank
129
High
21
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
57% (222-170)
Career Total W/L
54% (158-132)
56% (20-16)
YTD W/L
48% (12-13)
$5,735
Career Prize Money
$642,550
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ryan Nijboer | Shintaro Mochizuki |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:1 | 1:45:1 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (37/72) | 54% (36/67) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 51% (19/37) | 61% (22/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (20/35) | 35% (11/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 100% (4/4) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (34/67) | 46% (33/72) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ryan Nijboer | Shintaro Mochizuki |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (20/16) | 48% (12/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (47/36) | 48% (30/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (409/369) | 48% (287/305) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 38% (5/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (12/10) | 58% (7/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 126 | 59 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 143 | 111 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:7 | 1:53:29 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 230.92 | 230.72 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1433/2429) | 50% (982/1954) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (982/1433) | 67% (662/982) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (493/996) | 46% (443/972) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (125/281) | 45% (92/204) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1045/2497) | 41% (791/1911) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 47% (9/10) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (11/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (20/36) | 52% (12/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 36% (4/11) | 50% (5/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (23/18) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (23/5) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 17% (12/2) |
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Ryan Nijboer
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
62)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
George Goldhoff
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Ryan Nijboer
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Gabriel Debru
54%
(
52 of
96)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
6
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Laurent Lokoli
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
78 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
116)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
116)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(1) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Shintaro Mochizuki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
67%
(
93 of
138)
1st Serve %
53%
(
78 of
148)
21
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
11
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
78)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
33%
(
45 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
64 of
148)
157
Total Points Won
129
|
4-6 6-3 3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Facundo Bagnis
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38
Total Points Won
29
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Stefano Napolitano
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Nick Hardt
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
48%
(
26 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
47%
(
48 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
57%
(
59 of
103)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
51 of
95)
108
Total Points Won
90
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Daniel Altmaier
48%
(
35 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Marco Cecchinato
50%
(
57 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
43%
(
24 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
42%
(
47 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Francesco Ferrari
52%
(
47 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Nijboer Vs Mochizuki Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
